raysaikat
11-09 05:15 PM
Hi,
My wife came to US on H4 and changed to F1 status thru COS. She is doing Masters 2nd semester and went for F1 visa stamping this week in India. She got 221(g) pink slip asking explain her projects, plans afer study etc. Visa officier withheld her passport and I20.
BTW the way I am on H1B and provided all the financial support documents.
I searched the online didnt any F1 getting 221(g) pink.
1)If anyone else got this for F1 please share your experiences and any tips.
2)How long it takes after repsonding to thier queries
3)what are the chances getting visa after getting 221(g) pink
4) Do you suggest getting any professional in drafting the reponse to te queries.. if so do you know any one in Hyderabad, India
Thanks,
mohan517
Submit what the IO requested. With F1, the usual problem is proving no intent for immigration.
My wife came to US on H4 and changed to F1 status thru COS. She is doing Masters 2nd semester and went for F1 visa stamping this week in India. She got 221(g) pink slip asking explain her projects, plans afer study etc. Visa officier withheld her passport and I20.
BTW the way I am on H1B and provided all the financial support documents.
I searched the online didnt any F1 getting 221(g) pink.
1)If anyone else got this for F1 please share your experiences and any tips.
2)How long it takes after repsonding to thier queries
3)what are the chances getting visa after getting 221(g) pink
4) Do you suggest getting any professional in drafting the reponse to te queries.. if so do you know any one in Hyderabad, India
Thanks,
mohan517
Submit what the IO requested. With F1, the usual problem is proving no intent for immigration.
wallpaper jokes nigger trivia weekly
thomadnee
10-26 12:28 AM
I wanna know about green card in the US. how can I get it and what benifits and loss would we face after getting this ? can I get it by marriage from any American girl? or how ? plz help me !
ranand00
05-01 02:41 PM
Hi
My H1b was approved in feb 2010 for location A.Before I could start working at location A,my company found a better client (close to home,better pay) at location B .(different state).
what should my company do or have done with regards to lca for me to work at location b.
should lca have been approved before I moved to location b or could it be filed after i started working at location b. If lca was filed after I started working, is that ok.If not, how do we correct this.
thanks
anand
My H1b was approved in feb 2010 for location A.Before I could start working at location A,my company found a better client (close to home,better pay) at location B .(different state).
what should my company do or have done with regards to lca for me to work at location b.
should lca have been approved before I moved to location b or could it be filed after i started working at location b. If lca was filed after I started working, is that ok.If not, how do we correct this.
thanks
anand
2011 Rasist jokes, nigger jokes,
validIV
01-22 04:57 PM
Shouldn't be difficult but it is the USCIS that we are talking about after all. Unless it is passed as law, it wont happen. A dual stage I-485 application process was being discussed last year but nothing came out of it. Piecemeal legislations will not pass as the public wants CIR not bandaids.
And FYI, EAD does not eliminate employer dependency—you still need an employer.
And FYI, EAD does not eliminate employer dependency—you still need an employer.
more...
kumhyd2
09-06 10:31 PM
http://www.nationalpostdoc.org
IV Team: Contact this group to garner the support.
The National Postdoctoral Association is a professional association that provides a unique, national voice for postdoctoral scholars. The NPA was founded in 2003, with an ambitious agenda to enhance the quality of the postdoctoral experience. The NPA incorporated in the District of Columbia in 2005 as a non-profit organization. The IRS has approved the NPA as a charitable, educational organization under 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Charitable contributions to the NPA are tax deductible.
Since its founding, the NPA has assumed a leadership role in addressing the many issues confronting the postdoctoral community that are national in scope, requiring action beyond the local level. Key alliances are being forged at all levels, and new standards and policies proposed by NPA are being considered and adopted by federal agencies and research institutions throughout the U.S.
The NPA is supported by its members and charitable contributions from those who support its mission, including the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. To view a list of other NPA supporters, please click here.
IV Team: Contact this group to garner the support.
The National Postdoctoral Association is a professional association that provides a unique, national voice for postdoctoral scholars. The NPA was founded in 2003, with an ambitious agenda to enhance the quality of the postdoctoral experience. The NPA incorporated in the District of Columbia in 2005 as a non-profit organization. The IRS has approved the NPA as a charitable, educational organization under 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Charitable contributions to the NPA are tax deductible.
Since its founding, the NPA has assumed a leadership role in addressing the many issues confronting the postdoctoral community that are national in scope, requiring action beyond the local level. Key alliances are being forged at all levels, and new standards and policies proposed by NPA are being considered and adopted by federal agencies and research institutions throughout the U.S.
The NPA is supported by its members and charitable contributions from those who support its mission, including the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. To view a list of other NPA supporters, please click here.
willigetagc
07-25 02:10 PM
Please let me know. My lawyer has taken my personal checks and sent them to USCIS...
more...
chaukka
09-11 12:24 PM
Thanks. It seems I can not extend my J1 (Research Scholar) visa after getting the HRR waiver. Is anyobe aware of any foreign travel restrictions on a valid J1 visa with a granted HRR waiver?
2010 funny nigger jokes.
onemorecame
02-23 12:25 PM
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=TSC
Service Center Proc Times 02/20/09 Update
NSC EB-485 Proc Time = 4 Month!?!
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
is it mean something? is anybody got Soft LUD in thier case?
Service Center Proc Times 02/20/09 Update
NSC EB-485 Proc Time = 4 Month!?!
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
is it mean something? is anybody got Soft LUD in thier case?
more...
WaitingYaar
06-14 11:59 AM
There are lot of discussions about this issue, and there seem to be mixed opinions so far. it may not be a bad idea to check with your lawyer, and post your findings to the group. AFAIK, it is possible to file multiple I-485 but interim benefits should be tied to only one.
hair The nigger joke thread - Page
sheela
08-11 01:02 PM
Are you 16 or under? Were you applying with your parents? oh, i signed for my daughter aged 16
more...
indio0617
12-15 09:06 AM
In very simple terms : Progressive experience means your job responsibilities increase with time.
Have a question related to that:
If job / EB2 stipulates Bachelors + 5 years criteria, does it imply 5 years after obtaining the degree or can the experience be cumulative ?
Have a question related to that:
If job / EB2 stipulates Bachelors + 5 years criteria, does it imply 5 years after obtaining the degree or can the experience be cumulative ?
hot funny nigger jokes; funny nigger jokes. nigger babies - posters and
good idea
04-04 11:23 PM
IF labor approves, do labor dept informs employer only or they also inform candidate?
is it up to employer only to inform the candidate?
thanks.
is it up to employer only to inform the candidate?
thanks.
more...
house Jokes Site 6 Funny Jokes Site
gccovet
11-21 01:54 PM
few days ago, I tried to extend H4 visa for my spouse but I heard through one of the lawyer in the firm that once H4 visa holder used EAD, H4 becames invalid unless you enter again in POE using H4, we cant apply for H4 extension as the current status is AOS. But we are still exploring it.
I checked in H4 extension form I-539, they ask:
1. current immigration status?
2. whether you want to extend current status or change of status?
But my spouse is working so if we say change status to H4 from AOS then not sure whether she can use immediately EAD to work? I opened a thread regarding this.
Anybody experienced the same issue as above? Thanks.
Once your spouse started to use EAD (Work), spouse is no longer on H4 status and H4 status expires. You can reapply for H4 as long as primary applicant is still on H1. Once H4 is applied and i-797 issued, spouse had to go for stamping for h4 and reenter to be again in H4 status.
GCCovet.
I checked in H4 extension form I-539, they ask:
1. current immigration status?
2. whether you want to extend current status or change of status?
But my spouse is working so if we say change status to H4 from AOS then not sure whether she can use immediately EAD to work? I opened a thread regarding this.
Anybody experienced the same issue as above? Thanks.
Once your spouse started to use EAD (Work), spouse is no longer on H4 status and H4 status expires. You can reapply for H4 as long as primary applicant is still on H1. Once H4 is applied and i-797 issued, spouse had to go for stamping for h4 and reenter to be again in H4 status.
GCCovet.
tattoo tattoo funny nigger jokes.
kirupa
04-29 03:14 PM
Really nice stamps! Added them up :)
more...
pictures funny nigger jokes. funny
I-751
01-21 10:26 AM
Dear Sir/Madam,
I married to a US citizen and got conditional permanent residency which is subject to be removed after 2 years. I have been a student at a university, and while an application for permanent residency I had to show/combine my income (student teaching/research assistantship) in I-864 because my spouse's income was not sufficient to sponsor me. In form I-864 instructions it says, "Intending immigrant is your spouse, his/her income can be used to combine with your income if his/her income will continue from the same source after receiving lawful permanent residency." Now, my question is that I have an offer of admission from other school, and this new school will pay me student teaching/research assistantship, can I leave my current school and join the new one? If not, how long I have to wait in order to have right to change my school?
Secondly, can my spouse leave her job and sit idle? I ask this because my spouse sponsored me in I-864, and I wonder until when she is supposed to continue her current job!
Please advise me your best to help me with my doubts. I will be obliged!
I married to a US citizen and got conditional permanent residency which is subject to be removed after 2 years. I have been a student at a university, and while an application for permanent residency I had to show/combine my income (student teaching/research assistantship) in I-864 because my spouse's income was not sufficient to sponsor me. In form I-864 instructions it says, "Intending immigrant is your spouse, his/her income can be used to combine with your income if his/her income will continue from the same source after receiving lawful permanent residency." Now, my question is that I have an offer of admission from other school, and this new school will pay me student teaching/research assistantship, can I leave my current school and join the new one? If not, how long I have to wait in order to have right to change my school?
Secondly, can my spouse leave her job and sit idle? I ask this because my spouse sponsored me in I-864, and I wonder until when she is supposed to continue her current job!
Please advise me your best to help me with my doubts. I will be obliged!
dresses funny nigger jokes. nigger
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhltjlVrWvODK7SzSJ6I_o4ePbfLXgmhDIPWvBTJEjXq4owAYJYL4wf5InAfjFsI_G7Q5ctavtaleDnfHP8_k-xhUV_-VOdFk7bsja-8MDznjWUrkXBlhi46UxtUKSGNdr3N5FtrQ-3FQ8/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhltjlVrWvODK7SzSJ6I_o4ePbfLXgmhDIPWvBTJEjXq4owAYJYL4wf5InAfjFsI_G7Q5ctavtaleDnfHP8_k-xhUV_-VOdFk7bsja-8MDznjWUrkXBlhi46UxtUKSGNdr3N5FtrQ-3FQ8/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhltjlVrWvODK7SzSJ6I_o4ePbfLXgmhDIPWvBTJEjXq4owAYJYL4wf5InAfjFsI_G7Q5ctavtaleDnfHP8_k-xhUV_-VOdFk7bsja-8MDznjWUrkXBlhi46UxtUKSGNdr3N5FtrQ-3FQ8/s320/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhltjlVrWvODK7SzSJ6I_o4ePbfLXgmhDIPWvBTJEjXq4owAYJYL4wf5InAfjFsI_G7Q5ctavtaleDnfHP8_k-xhUV_-VOdFk7bsja-8MDznjWUrkXBlhi46UxtUKSGNdr3N5FtrQ-3FQ8/s1600-h/2009-12-16+woman+in+prision.jpg)There was some good news Wednesday for asylum seekers. ICE assistant secretary John Morton announced that the government would no longer detain them if they can prove their identities, are not dangerous or a flight risk, and have a credible fear of persecution or torture in their home countries. http://bit.ly/4LM3F1
But it might be a tad early to celebrate.
The details of the plan are not yet clear. As Professor Regina Germaine of the Georgetown University Law Center observed in an email message to an Immigration Professors' Listserve, "the criteria for release has always been (since 1996) the 3 factors mentioned by John Morton - 1) ID, 2) not a danger or flight risk, and 3) credible fear. And the lack of one or more of these factors is cited when ICE refuses to release someone."
So, has Morton announced a new policy or has he simply restated the existing policy in a way which suggests release, but, in fact, will lead to continued detention of asylum seekers?
Another unanswered issue is whether the policy will be followed by ICE officers throughout the country. Professor Margaret Taylor of Wake Forest University suggests it's an open question. "Hopefully there will be 'buy in' and compliance in the field offices with this policy, but history suggests otherwise."
For now let's take the Administration at its word. But time will tell whether the draconian policy of incarcerating people who seek refuge in America has finally come to an end.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-808347624409550952?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/12/ice-announces-it-will-no-longer-detain.html)
more...
makeup funny nigger jokes. funny
sivananda
03-31 01:58 PM
How long will it take to get the receipt number when we apply for H-1 extension? And how long will it take to get the decision?
I am assuming when I have the receipt number, I can be considered to be in legal status and keep working with my present employer though I-94 is expired.
Please help with your answers/suggestions.
Thanks a lot.
I am assuming when I have the receipt number, I can be considered to be in legal status and keep working with my present employer though I-94 is expired.
Please help with your answers/suggestions.
Thanks a lot.
girlfriend Funny Nigger Jokes
IWannaBeHowdy
11-26 02:20 PM
Hello All,
My company filed for my H1-B extension and I have already received the Notice Of Action (Receipt) with "Received date: October 21, 2008" and "Notice Date: October 24, 2008." My case is in Vermont Center. However when I do the case search on USCIS.gov site, it says:
"Your case can not be found at this time in Case Status Online. Please check your receipt number and try again. If you need further assistance, you can either call the National Customer Service Center at 1.800.375.5283, or you can send an e-mail to uscis.webmaster@dhs.gov."
I did not type my EAC number incorrectly. I did try to call the above number, which happens to be the national center's number. However it goes in loops and loops but I was not able to speak to a Customer Service representative...I tried almost all applicable options.
Is there a way i can call the Vermont Service directly. If so could anyone please list that number. I would really appreciate any kind of help and suggestions regarding this.
Thank you in Advance.
My company filed for my H1-B extension and I have already received the Notice Of Action (Receipt) with "Received date: October 21, 2008" and "Notice Date: October 24, 2008." My case is in Vermont Center. However when I do the case search on USCIS.gov site, it says:
"Your case can not be found at this time in Case Status Online. Please check your receipt number and try again. If you need further assistance, you can either call the National Customer Service Center at 1.800.375.5283, or you can send an e-mail to uscis.webmaster@dhs.gov."
I did not type my EAC number incorrectly. I did try to call the above number, which happens to be the national center's number. However it goes in loops and loops but I was not able to speak to a Customer Service representative...I tried almost all applicable options.
Is there a way i can call the Vermont Service directly. If so could anyone please list that number. I would really appreciate any kind of help and suggestions regarding this.
Thank you in Advance.
hairstyles funny nigger jokes. nigger
desixp
05-21 11:03 AM
Hi,
I think that status means you are greened.
I think that status means you are greened.
cox
October 18th, 2005, 11:26 PM
I have a gig shooting silk flowers this weekend, and you have given me something to shoot for (no pun intended)!